 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Tanvir Mahtab
|
| | | (...) Ouch. (...) It wasn't "just" posted on your forum. It was highlighted as "top story" on the homepage of this website. I am not a member of your forum, but I am a member of lugnet, and replied as such. If you don't want outsiders invading your (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Unfortunately it is not possible to stop anyone from spotlighting any post they want to, so that request is pointless. ROSCO (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) We in rtlT have control over what is spotlighted? Wow! We in rtlT have control over who bringswhat thread into our NG? That's great! We in rtlT have control over who can post in this NG? Perfect! That'll make things much better for us--nowif (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) K, that was a little too snarky, even for me. I apologize. Dave K -note: no admin or anyone else e-mailed me to tell me to rethink my post. I just read it again and realized that it really was too snarky. (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) It was funny though. And made the point. (...) Apology accepted on behalf of just me. But we're still not mailing you the instruction manual. (because there isn't one!) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
