Subject:
|
Re: Board - Plate interface
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:56:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
468 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Michael Purvis wrote:
| |
Just wanted to confirm the interface between gameboard and baseplates. Are
the images below correct? (with the pins attached, of course -- they’re
separated for clarity)
|
The rules state the common platform is 32x48 (32x32 and a 32x16). So there’s no
clean edge like you have there, you’d have to overlap onto the common platform
by about five studs.
That’s because no baseplate with the width of the legs exists (22 dots IIRC).
The excess of the 32 dots is made up on both sides.
We’ll all have to somehow “plop” our robots and overhang them on the common
platform’s extra 5 dot edge.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Board - Plate interface
|
| (...) Okay, glad I checked. I got it fixed now so that there's a 'track' that I lay down on the common area. It only joins with about 10 studs, so it's like two seconds to put on. I know we had a discussion at one point about not sitting there (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Board - Plate interface
|
| Just wanted to confirm the interface between gameboard and baseplates. Are the images below correct? (with the pins attached, of course -- they're separated for clarity) (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
