 | | Re: Sweep Building
|
|
That whole layout visible in the pics is quite impressive, and your building even more so. Thanks for taking the time to post pics of the techniques and design process. As for the building itself, very nice concept and ver nice execution, great job! (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Few things to wrap up last weekend's train show
|
|
First, how'd that piece of track turn out? Related to that, I know that Jeff was walking around, taking pictures of the 'flaws' in the layout--was there any feedback regarding the layout in general? Any specific things needed? Any ideas for the (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto Space 1 (without the square brackets...)
|
|
(...) We would probably need some plain corridor sections (T and +) as many simple modules have only one connection... P.S. for those who haven't seen it, the moonbase standard is explained in extreme detail here (URL) A> (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto Space 1 (without the square brackets...)
|
|
(...) I would definitely be interested if this was something to do Hobby Show. I really don't want to bring the train layout to the Hobby show again. The crowed just isn't as respectful as they are at the train shows, and it's a pain to setup (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto Space 1 (without the square brackets...)
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) I thik it's really great as well, but I also don't think that should stop the non-moonbase spec folks from bringing stuff. I'll probably build a few moonbases to spec myself. (...) Let's (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
