| |
Kevin,
With the decals that model really rocks, we would have won first place if the
decals had been on the model at the show!
>
> > Big Red is my fave engine from your group... nice and beefy.
>
> A sketch of what it would've looked like if I'd gotten around to applying
> (purists beware) the decals (gasp!) can be found here -
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=15950
>
>
> A 6-wide version is pending though. BigRed is too fat to fit most places on
> Michel's layout, so I'll need one that will.
> Unless of course the layout gets a redesign.. ah, 'tis nice to have a dream :)
I intend to rebuild the bridge, how much clearance, widthwise does big red
need? The first layout I have been playing with, has three bridges, (all
the 30.5 inch size) two for trains and one for monorail. I can build a simple
second bridge with ZNAP, unless someone in the group wants to mechanize one.
James has offered to improve the tunnel/mountain, I am not sure if he can allow
clearances for 8 wides. It would probably take "rafters" made of technic beams
to allow the necessary clearance, yet be strong enough to support a roof or
upper level.
Michel
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NALUG takes 2nd at Great Edmonton Train Show
|
| Michel Magnan wrote in message ... (...) one. (...) allow (...) beams (...) Did I here someone say "Technic beams"? :-] There are numerous ways to get the necessary clearance, and Technic beams would certainly do it. Also, the second bridge could (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
