 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) No! Read them carefully. They do among other things say: »Sublicense to third parties the unrestricted right to exercise any or all of the foregoing rights granted with respect to the communication.« That is just the same as the sublicensing (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Excellent idea. Yes, more international involvement before too long. (...) Kelly (he -- Irish name) is of Portland, Oregon. (...) Indeed! (...) I agree gtg --Todd (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | w00t! Fund Drive for LUGNET Servers
|
|
We appreciated your patience during the downtime today Thank you for bearing an unusually long downtime today. We certainly weren't expecting a 9-hour outage simply for the replacement of a disk. You may have noticed on the LUGNET homepage during (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.castle, lugnet.space, lugnet.org, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Not that I've seen. However, this comment was in reply to your asking why content was different than code, which I hadn't seen addressed elsewhere. (...) Actually, the Lugnet T&Cs reserve Lugnet's right to redistribute all content posted, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Hear hear! I'll speak the same for myself (and as much as I have the power to do so, the same for the LEGO MindStorms Forums). LEGO is such a community-focused product that I think it's the least I can do to offer my help if it's wanted. Just (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have I rejected that distinction anywhere? (...) Yes. Have I ever claimed anything else? (...) Wrong. They would have to give LFN a license to distribute their work, just as you have given Lugnet a license to distribute your work, when you (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Good Man! This is great news Todd. (...) Great team! May I suggest you should consider asking one or two international representatives as well (unless Kelly is, because she (he?) apparently isn't a Lugnet member and I have never met them)? I'm (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) The courts of the US have repeatedly upheld the distinction of infrastructure vs. content. For example, spammers using an ISP to send millions of non-solicited emails are liable for their actions, while the ISP is not (unless the ISP knowingly (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
In lugnet.announce, Todd Lehman wrote: much great stuff snipped Todd- I think this is fantastic! It's great to see your enthusiasm and the great new ideas! Please let us know where, how and if we can be of any help. We'd love to work closely with (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Although, see the post I'm just about to make. (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Thank you for your constructive criticism last week, Troy. It made a difference. --Todd (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Well, from my point of view, it is broke... But it's very fixable. (...) I feel that way as well. (...) Thanks...although I certainly can't claim sole credit for that. (...) I'm not super-familiar with the LDraw.org system lately, but maybe (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Great news all-around Todd! I am glad to be wrong about change not coming to Lugnet! I look forward to seeing what you and your advisory Committee come up with. If we at Classic-Castle.com can help in any way, do not hesitate to ask. Troy (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations
|
|
(...) I have a somewhat different view of things. I would rather block access to my server from the USA than having to be responsible for its content according to laws in the USA. (...) Only sensible rules. And they are basically the same for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) That is one of those tricky problems we haven't resolved yet. But I can say as much as that LEGO hasn't said no to it yet (although I expect they will). No matter what, the rights I imagine are important for LEGO (that other people don't (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) In practice yes (although the current oligarchy is not in complete agreement about all details of this :-). It could for example be a self-supplementing group or a group appointed through some kind of democratic process. (...) Since it is not (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Yeah, sorry -- not trying to be unfair. I'm just curious about how that'll all work out. (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) To be fair, since nothing's set in stone, this is a little hard to answer 100% guarenteed. It is, however, what our current planning is based on. Jennifer Boger (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) What about the official Lego exclusive pictures/releases, etc., alluded to in the original announcement? (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) That's also exactly what I wrote. (...) Why? It will really push the group operating LEGOFan.net to keep doing their best. Isn't that good? (...) Why? (...) That's what I wrote. LEGOFan.net will of course not be able to force other sites to do (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
