 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) No! Read them carefully. They do among other things say: »Sublicense to third parties the unrestricted right to exercise any or all of the foregoing rights granted with respect to the communication.« That is just the same as the sublicensing (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Excellent idea. Yes, more international involvement before too long. (...) Kelly (he -- Irish name) is of Portland, Oregon. (...) Indeed! (...) I agree gtg --Todd (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | w00t! Fund Drive for LUGNET Servers
|
|
We appreciated your patience during the downtime today Thank you for bearing an unusually long downtime today. We certainly weren't expecting a 9-hour outage simply for the replacement of a disk. You may have noticed on the LUGNET homepage during (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.castle, lugnet.space, lugnet.org, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Not that I've seen. However, this comment was in reply to your asking why content was different than code, which I hadn't seen addressed elsewhere. (...) Actually, the Lugnet T&Cs reserve Lugnet's right to redistribute all content posted, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Hear hear! I'll speak the same for myself (and as much as I have the power to do so, the same for the LEGO MindStorms Forums). LEGO is such a community-focused product that I think it's the least I can do to offer my help if it's wanted. Just (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have I rejected that distinction anywhere? (...) Yes. Have I ever claimed anything else? (...) Wrong. They would have to give LFN a license to distribute their work, just as you have given Lugnet a license to distribute your work, when you (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Good Man! This is great news Todd. (...) Great team! May I suggest you should consider asking one or two international representatives as well (unless Kelly is, because she (he?) apparently isn't a Lugnet member and I have never met them)? I'm (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) The courts of the US have repeatedly upheld the distinction of infrastructure vs. content. For example, spammers using an ISP to send millions of non-solicited emails are liable for their actions, while the ISP is not (unless the ISP knowingly (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
In lugnet.announce, Todd Lehman wrote: much great stuff snipped Todd- I think this is fantastic! It's great to see your enthusiasm and the great new ideas! Please let us know where, how and if we can be of any help. We'd love to work closely with (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Although, see the post I'm just about to make. (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
