 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Have I rejected that distinction anywhere? (...) Yes. Have I ever claimed anything else? (...) Wrong. They would have to give LFN a license to distribute their work, just as you have given Lugnet a license to distribute your work, when you (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Good Man! This is great news Todd. (...) Great team! May I suggest you should consider asking one or two international representatives as well (unless Kelly is, because she (he?) apparently isn't a Lugnet member and I have never met them)? I'm (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) The courts of the US have repeatedly upheld the distinction of infrastructure vs. content. For example, spammers using an ISP to send millions of non-solicited emails are liable for their actions, while the ISP is not (unless the ISP knowingly (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
In lugnet.announce, Todd Lehman wrote: much great stuff snipped Todd- I think this is fantastic! It's great to see your enthusiasm and the great new ideas! Please let us know where, how and if we can be of any help. We'd love to work closely with (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Although, see the post I'm just about to make. (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Thank you for your constructive criticism last week, Troy. It made a difference. --Todd (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Well, from my point of view, it is broke... But it's very fixable. (...) I feel that way as well. (...) Thanks...although I certainly can't claim sole credit for that. (...) I'm not super-familiar with the LDraw.org system lately, but maybe (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
|
|
(...) Great news all-around Todd! I am glad to be wrong about change not coming to Lugnet! I look forward to seeing what you and your advisory Committee come up with. If we at Classic-Castle.com can help in any way, do not hesitate to ask. Troy (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations
|
|
(...) I have a somewhat different view of things. I would rather block access to my server from the USA than having to be responsible for its content according to laws in the USA. (...) Only sensible rules. And they are basically the same for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) That is one of those tricky problems we haven't resolved yet. But I can say as much as that LEGO hasn't said no to it yet (although I expect they will). No matter what, the rights I imagine are important for LEGO (that other people don't (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
