To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.orgOpen lugnet.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / 716 (-10)
  Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
 
(...) Thank you for your constructive criticism last week, Troy. It made a difference. --Todd (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
 
  Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
 
(...) Well, from my point of view, it is broke... But it's very fixable. (...) I feel that way as well. (...) Thanks...although I certainly can't claim sole credit for that. (...) I'm not super-familiar with the LDraw.org system lately, but maybe (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, FTX)
 
  Re: Taking LUGNET to the next level
 
(...) Great news all-around Todd! I am glad to be wrong about change not coming to Lugnet! I look forward to seeing what you and your advisory Committee come up with. If we at Classic-Castle.com can help in any way, do not hesitate to ask. Troy (22 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org)
 
  Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations
 
(...) I have a somewhat different view of things. I would rather block access to my server from the USA than having to be responsible for its content according to laws in the USA. (...) Only sensible rules. And they are basically the same for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) That is one of those tricky problems we haven't resolved yet. But I can say as much as that LEGO hasn't said no to it yet (although I expect they will). No matter what, the rights I imagine are important for LEGO (that other people don't (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) In practice yes (although the current oligarchy is not in complete agreement about all details of this :-). It could for example be a self-supplementing group or a group appointed through some kind of democratic process. (...) Since it is not (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)  
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) Yeah, sorry -- not trying to be unfair. I'm just curious about how that'll all work out. (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) To be fair, since nothing's set in stone, this is a little hard to answer 100% guarenteed. It is, however, what our current planning is based on. Jennifer Boger (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)  
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) What about the official Lego exclusive pictures/releases, etc., alluded to in the original announcement? (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
 
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) That's also exactly what I wrote. (...) Why? It will really push the group operating LEGOFan.net to keep doing their best. Isn't that good? (...) Why? (...) That's what I wrote. LEGOFan.net will of course not be able to force other sites to do (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR