 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
Firstly, thanks to Jacob for responding to my concerns (and those of others) and explaining things a bit more. (...) OK, I am relieved to hear that LEGOfan.net would not simply accept any new code without some sort of evaluation process. Still, that (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) I think one thing that's being missed here is that you wouldn't be forced to use ANY of the features. There would be a basic 'start-up' set of features from which each individual person could choose which features they want to use from a large (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
In lugnet.org, Brendan Powell Smith wrote: <snip> (...) Brendan, In my experience, opensource projects are generally only successfully forked when the community of users has a deep problem with the original project. This problem can be as simple as (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) OK, that makes sense, if that's how it'll work. @8^) -Brendan (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) In practice yes (although the current oligarchy is not in complete agreement about all details of this :-). It could for example be a self-supplementing group or a group appointed through some kind of democratic process. (...) Since it is not (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)
|
