 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) Dan will start throwing heavy stuff across the Atlantic, if I claim it is vapor-ware at the moment, but it is at least not in a usable state yet. Basically (and possibly not quite correctly) it is a content management system with access (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Chris Gray
|
| | | | | (...) That sounds like mostly server-side stuff. Have you figured out yet what you are going to require from clients (users)? The reason I ask is that I'm an old-fashioned soul, and am unlikely to use discussion groups that are not NNTP-reachable, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think any standards compliant browser should work for the website, oh, and IE. We do want to implement an NNTP interface as well as an SMTP, for as much content as possible. My personal philosophy is that javascript can be used only to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | | (...) It is. (...) As little as possible. We want to make the content accessible in as many different ways as possible, but preferably using existing protocols like NNTP, SMTP and NNTP. (...) You sound like a Jacob clone. :-) But it could be fun to (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | (...) Which part of the community, specifically? General LEGO fans? Webmasters of other LEGO-related fan web sites? (...) Why? Although I have been vocal in my opinion that Lugnet is not the perfect LEGO hub site, since it deals with a subset of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.org, Kelly McKiernan wrote: [snip the rest of what Kelly said] (...) As Jake explained LEGOfan (the concept, the reasons for it) to me, I think its a great idea. It coincides with much of what the WorldLUG concept posted, so I'm encouraged (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) Does anyone care to answer Kelly's original post? I'm curious. (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community. —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Well, if it comes down to it, there's a reason the Lugnet groups are all in a lugnet hierarchy. But as you may have gathered from my other posts, I'm strongly in favor of not duplicating discussion forums. (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
