To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.orgOpen lugnet.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / 652
651  |  653
Subject: 
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org
Date: 
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:12:55 GMT
Viewed: 
4429 times
  
In lugnet.org, David Laswell wrote:
In lugnet.org, Matthew Miller wrote:
I'm surprised you guys haven't thrown up a splash page or something, at
least. Maybe with a "mission statement" and info on getting involved.

I'm not.  Until they have explicit permission from TLC to register a domain name
containing their trademarked brand name, it would be a blatant violation of
trademark rights to do so.  Not a good way to start off this proposed
relationship with TLC, wouldn't you think?

On a technical note, the domain is ALREADY registered.  It has been since
august:

Domain Name: LEGOFAN.NET
Registrar: TUCOWS INC.
Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
Referral URL: http://domainhelp.tucows.com
Name Server: NS1.DOMAINDIRECT.COM
Name Server: NS2.DOMAINDIRECT.COM
Name Server: NS3.DOMAINDIRECT.COM
Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
Updated Date: 18-aug-2003
Creation Date: 18-aug-2003
Expiration Date: 18-aug-2004

It doesn't say WHO registered it, but my hope would be that it was someone
involved with the project in anticipation of being approved to use it.

Troy



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) Not sure what whois info you are looking at - but here is the full report: (same info as legofan.com) Registrant: Dan Boger 243 White St Belmont, MA 02478 US Domain name: LEGOFAN.NET Administrative Contact: Boger, Dan domains@peeron.com 243 (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) I'm not. Until they have explicit permission from TLC to register a domain name containing their trademarked brand name, it would be a blatant violation of trademark rights to do so. Not a good way to start off this proposed relationship with (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.org)

208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR