Subject:
|
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:00:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3590 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org, Ray Sanders wrote:
> Open Source and Open Content licenses have similar goals
> but different structures because of the focus of the
> license. I'm still unclear about what control you are
> referring to here thay may need to be relaxed. Do Todd and
> Suz own all the content on LUGNET ?
Yes. Or rather; they own the copy of the content stored on
Lugnet and are free to do practically whatever they want to
do with it.
> My read of this is that (in the great words of The WELL)
> 'I own my words'.
You do. But you have given a copy away to Lugnet.
> I'm sure that there are some things here (LUGNET Guide ?)
> which are not covered by the above, but I'm not seeing a
> lack of open content here. Please help me to understand
> your point of view.
My point is that in case Lugnet is about to go off-line,
somebody can't just make a copy of the site, put it up and
keep all the content available. Having the content under a
free license removes a possible failure point that often
hits smaller LEGO fan sites, but also could hit a site like
Lugnet.
We, as individuals, own our respective articles posted on
Lugnet, but not as a collected structure. Lugnet owns the
collected structure. That is the problematic point as I see
it.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Experimental parallel cable-stayed bridge:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Broer/Skr%E5stagsbro-parallel/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
