|
I don't think I've ever more agreed with Larry <grin>
October 1992 or 1994 was when John G and I started to build with Conan and
Chuck. John G a little sooner than I, it was right about the time that Conan
came to work at the Lego Imagination Center and we met them. Since Conan
lived in a house with a few other guys, the gathering was informal, but
frequent.
(Year date is different because I don't remember if I was already married or
not. Oct 93 was in CT as a model builder, cuz that was the year I got
married.)
-John
emails should go to jkelly3@yahoo.com, the other email is just a refuge for
spam, I never check it.
In lugnet.org, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > I guess what I'm looking for is the exact date on which GMLTC started calling
> > itself GMLTC (i.e., that it became that entity, however informally) and also,
> > if known, the date on which people in the Twin Cities (those who initially
> > founded GMLTC) started congregating and saying, "Hey, we should make a thing
> > of this."
>
> Why exactly? (both senses...) That is, exactly why do you need to know this,
> and why does it have to be exact? Would the year be good enough? GMLTC started
> from one guy and his uncle who loved LEGO and grew from there. It's the
> granddaddy of all LEGO train clubs, leave it at that. Not dissing PNLTC, they
> were a clear second historically, and more organised sooner, but they are two
> different beasts.
>
> Like John G. said, most GMLTCers could care less (but not very much less)
> about promotion, names, club structure, details, they just want to build. The
> notable exceptions are John 8wide Neal and myself. We do it mostly for fun,
> and I'm only an adjunct member, haven't been to a building session in almost a
> year now. <sigh> It was in part 8wide that caused the club even to have a name
> and a logo in the first place. That happend well before there was any
> statements of club existance on RTL or LUGNET.
>
> My 1.3 pence. (in the lounge at DTW awaiting my LGW flight to be called so
> I'll think in Sterling, ok?)
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|