|
|
 | | test
|
| test (22 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | test
|
| (22 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | foo
|
| (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | ftx test
|
| You want the FTX? (URL) You can't handle the FTX! And did that FTX, oof ancient times, Walk upon Lugnet's mountains green...? Michael (22 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: more test ftx...
|
| (...) Well, except that large images are visually obnoxious... --Bram (2 URLs) Bram Lambrecht (URL) www.bldesign.org> (22 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Sig test
|
| Signature test... --Bram (2 URLs) Bram Lambrecht (URL) www.bldesign.org> (22 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: more test ftx...
|
| Whacha want is for it to load fast regardless of pixel size. First, optimize it -- then it can be as large (pixel-wise) as you want. -- Hop-Frog (URL) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | more test ftx...
|
| how small can i make my .sig pic and still have it legible?? (2 URLs) Sparky's Space--Where Sparky has his Space... I changed the size of the image, but the displayed size is still the same--even though the image is only 120x90, still displaying as (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Testing with pictures
|
| (...) Whoa. OOPS. I POSTED IT TWICE!!! Sorry didn't notice!!! I hope I don't do that again, and I probably won't. Matt C. (22 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Testing with pictures
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test, Mark de Kock wrote: (URL) goto-lab>> Hey, that looks cool. I have a question: how do you edit pictures on your computer??? Thanks, Matt C. P.S. oops I accidentally messed up the link... (22 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
|
