 | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) oh yah? check this out! ob. o-t.test: 7 8 9 :) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) doh! that didn't thread at all! does it work now? (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) Ya think so? No, really. I don't know. ps. any 'specitsic (1) reason why your reply started a new thread? or is that part'o'the test? (1) as my sis says it Oh, and BTW: 10 11 12. 12 lady bugs went to a picnic. -Shiri (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) yah, cause my lugnetreader wasn't threading correctly... hope it works better now...? (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) Yes! It does. I never understood why sometimes replies yield new threads...? -Shiri BTW, you of all people should recognize the 12 lady-bugs... (Ahat shtayim shalosh. Arba hamesh shesh. Sheva Shmona Teisha. Eser 'Hat 'sre Shteim esre... Shteim (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) one last test for the day... (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: testing...
|
| (...) cause when it was sending mail, it wasn't setting the References header correctly... View the raw message, and you'll see it there now. That way, the server knows what message I'm referring to. (...) I was a bit too old for it when it came (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| |
