|
|
 | | Test hannes
|
| Testing (26 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | test
|
| Test post body (26 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Move along, nothing happening here...
|
| (...) It is a cool idea :) How about replacing <<part:3005>> with something like a numbered superscript [1], and displaying it in the spare white space to the right of the message? You could do something similar with <<set:6277>> :) In both cases (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | (no subject)
|
| (26 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Move along, nothing happening here...
|
| (...) Yup -- that's about 99% right! What happens is this: <set:xxxx yyyyyyyy> It considers "set:xxxx" to be a URI with a fictitious protocol called "set". Thus, it considers "xxxx" to be a URL. Then it considers "yyyyyyyy" (optional) to be (...) (26 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
|
