Subject:
|
Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:55:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@%spamcake%uswest.net
|
Viewed:
|
43 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
> > IMPOSTER!! What have you done with the *real* Thomas McSpamcake??? You
> > may be able to fool Lugnet
>
> No no, it's Legnut. Either nuts about Lego or legs, whichever.
220, 221, whatever it takes. I used to enjoy a Zagnut every now and then...
> > but not me. Nnnnnnnnnoo. Confess, or face the
> > consequences, counterfeit interlocutor!
>
> I am Interlocutor of Borg..
Resistance is toofewtile
> > -John "Sherlock" Neal
>
> *The* Sherlock? As in, "No Shir^Ht Sherlock?" :-)
That's right; No shir^Ht, no shoes, no service <packs>
> -Tom McD.
> when replying, "angels and ministers of spamcake defend us!" - Spamlet, act I
> scene IV.
"By the bricking of my thumbs, something bricked this way comes" - McSpameth,
act IV scene I
;John
>
>
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> >
> > > Or to be unemcumbered by George C. Scott..
> > >
> > >
> > > When you dissect jokes they die.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about...
|
| (...) No no, it's Legnut. Either nuts about Lego or legs, whichever. (...) I am Interlocutor of Borg.. (...) *The* Sherlock? As in, "No Shir^Ht Sherlock?" :-) -Tom McD. when replying, "angels and ministers of spamcake defend us!" - Spamlet, act I (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
