Subject:
|
Re: Going up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:22:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1974 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
Now thats what I
call upward mobility.
|
That would be cool if it comes off.
Color me skeptical for now. Space Elevators are an idea that has been around
since forever, and if you have the materials strength to do it, they offer the
cheapest way per pound of any technology devised.
IF you have the materials (primarily tensile) strength. 50x (mild) steel isnt
enough according to some studies I seem to recall...
this
site suggests that nanotubes are within the right target tensile strength range
though.
Me, Im betting on SpaceX for conventional reusable heavy lift of earth only
components and on Rutan to pull off a clever miracle for crew, and for lunar
sourcing for serious construction mass.
But an elevator would be cool!
|
|
Message has 4 Replies: | | Re: Going up
|
| (...) I agree with all of the above, even if I still have reservations about the value of manned space exploration. (...) I just hope that it's faster than the one in my building. It would be faster to walk into orbit. Dave! (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | Re: Going up
|
| (...) I should note, that site's content seems cribbed from the Wikipedia article on the same topic. I noticed that when I found ANOTHER site that had very similar phrasing and decided to look up (URL) Space Elevator> in the Wikipedia. Further, if (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | Re: Going up
|
| (...) The plan sounds like Brad Edwards plan (here's the closest I can get to his website): (URL) He did a NIAC study on it, a well-written and researched one, *including* the economic aspects (something often overlooked). *IF* you can get carbon (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|