Subject:
|
Re: Couldn't resist
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:04:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
SSGORE@spamlessSUPERONLINE.COM
|
Viewed:
|
5 times
|
| |
|
|
Jesse Alan Long wrote:
>
> I have two more questions to ask you, Jason. The first question is would
> Newtonian physics contradict or complement the laws of aerodynamics? If
> there are any contradictions or further explanations from these rules,
> please explain them to me, Jason. The second question is what would work
> for an antigravity device for space craft, that is what materials and
> options could we use for space craft? I am glad that the long ordeal about
> the eternal space craft ethical war is almost over in Lugnet.
> Jesse Long
Laws of aerodynamics (aero*dynamics*) are nothing but Newtonian physics.
The whole governing equation of aerodynamics, the famous Navier-Stokes
equation, is just a different representation of our well known F=ma.
By the way, is it a miracle or what? Our dear Jesse the
Confused/Confusing Man finally posted a well organized and worded
message(1). Even, without any clue of misunderstandings of basic
science, and even with clues about "making fun before".
So were I right about non-existence of The Jesse Character portrayed in
previous weird posts, instead, a real Jesse (or whatever) was making fun
of us?..:-)
Selçuk
(1) http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=9629
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Couldn't resist
|
| (...) You said in the last letter before this letter that some liquids (referring to the reaction to friction of certain particles in outer space) are viscious while some solids are very hard and smooth in reaction to friction in outer space. If (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
195 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
