Subject:
|
Re: A heirarchical database question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Nov 2000 12:08:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
141 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > (I don't like redundancy in database designs, it causes data staleness and
> > introduces errors)
>
> Agreed. But sometimes, the price paid for normalization is too high. It
> depends on the level of adhoc querying against the data. And the skill
> level of the developer.
Agreed. But the original design was broken.
I proposed two alternatives, both less redundant and both "more correct",
although flaws could be found in either one by the determined examiner.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread: ![A heirarchical database question -Jim Hughes (15-Nov-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A heirarchical database question -Christopher Lindsey (15-Nov-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: A heirarchical database question -Steve Bliss (15-Nov-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A heirarchical database question -Larry Pieniazek (16-Nov-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A heirarchical database question -Steve Bliss (17-Nov-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|