| |
They possibly do...I checked your message, and it's Precedence, NOT
X-Precedence....is this something you could check on and fix if required?
[or is this just my mail server here...the one that prevents threading? ]
Benjamin Whytcross
BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au
Ph: (03) 9856 5282
Directory Technology Pty Ltd
1/436 Elgar Road,
Box Hill, 3128
Growing older is compulsory...Growing up isn't :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Lehman [mailto:lehman@javanet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:29 AM
> To: lugnet.general@lugnet.com; lugnet.off-topic.geek@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: Unexpected Email Message
>
>
> In lugnet.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> > I get 2-3 of these every time I post to the robotics group. • People seem to
> > have forgotten the standard netiquette of unsubscribe to • lists when you go
> > on vacation. (Or at least filtering them around your
> vacation message.)
>
> Hmm, that's too bad. :-( I thought auto-responders were
> supposed to look at
> the X-Precedence header of the SMTP message and not respond
> if the value was
> set to 'list' or 'bulk'.
>
> --Todd
>
> [followups to .off-topic.geek]
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Unexpected Email Message
|
| (...) Thanks for the correction. Yes, it is indeed the 'Precedence' header and not the 'X-Precedence' header. The outgoing news-to-mail gateway on LUGNET sets 'Precedence' to 'list' for both regular and digest messages. --Todd [followups to (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
