 | | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines) —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) Both of the above are common output from LDAO code. (...) Well, I was just throwing stuff out. I don't know if LDraw would take that one, or not. (...) Darned context-sensitive constructions. (...) I didn't say they made sense. Just that they (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines) —Paul Gyugyi
| | | | | Hey now, that's beginning to look like the yacc grammer for LDRAW in the LDLite source code. If you want to get precise in the language spec, grab the LDLite lex and yacc files and either take them as the defacto standard or modify them to handle (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Oh, good. Then I wrote something close to correct. :) (...) That's probably a good idea. Most people will just scratch their heads at them, but some people would find it useful. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
