 | | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) barring the groupwise servers, our main file servers (9 of them that users "touch") have been upgraded in place, and for some reason... they didn't like it. when DS is requested to be opened, it takes like 3.5 mins (weird) we haven't had time (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) I think that they have in fact removed a few things from the 6.1 installl disk (it's a pretty tight squeeze), but it shouldn't have been anything remotely mainstream. In my (humble, of course) opinion, the 6.1/6.2 installer is terribly broken. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) jazz) (...) That's strange. Servers on our internal network were extremely long-lived in the 4.x days, even with 10000's of objects in the tree. (Well, the non-Groupwise servers, anyway.) What conditions do you think lead to your servers going (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) soon to be netware 5. we're upgrading. All our servers are at 4.2 (or 4.11, same thing, different support packs) we're busy trying to merge the current enterprise of 3000 (with groupwise and zenworks/winstall/NAL and all that jazz) into a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another request to LDlite programmers...
|
|
(...) hey now, sometimes they live longer than a week... we have one that's been up 100s of days... (it's one we don't do much to) :) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
