|
|
 | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) This line of argument is of course only fair when taken as "of course there is a deficiency in its incompleteness, but the next film will turn that into an asset." (You will probably be let down again at its ending... it too should have the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) What is your picture of hobbits? Bigger heads? (Rankin/Bass?) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Sometimes being vocal about the hobby pays off
|
| (...) (URL) thanks, Shiri! ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) Yes... even the book version of the Nazgul gave my daughter nightmares when she first read LOTR aged about 10. I can't see taking a kid younger than that to the movie if they (Nazgul) have been done right. I must say I've been put off going to (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It's possible that you and I (and probably a few others around here) are the only ones who've seen and enjoyed Barry Lyndon--a good pick, though! (...) Haven't seen that in a few years, and it's not a particular favorite for me, but it's (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
