 | | Re: The Origins Debate
|
|
(...) Baseball (...) Perhaps they just bounce too much.... ROSCO (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Should not be re-released.
|
|
(...) Well I would definitely argue strongly that LEGO Fans ought to have either 0 or -1 income... our addiction is a source of expense that consumes all else. The other values I gave seem about right although I haven't playtested extensively. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Should not be re-released.
|
|
(...) Or The Network. Ever seen a LEGO set that didn't have a UPC code? (...) LOL! I think I've got some cards to make up when I go home... Fnord. James (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Should not be re-released.
|
|
Man, that's freaky. For a second, I thought the INWO list was talking about the Lego issue... not vice versa. :P Evil Wayne ___...___ "There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 6776 Should not be re-released.
|
|
(...) Ooooh! Sharp pointy objects! And shiny too! (...) It is NOT *at all* baffling to anyone who's ever played Illuminati. Obviously whichever Illuminati controls "LEGO" (alignments: peaceful, straight, power 3/1 resistance 2, income 3, 1 out (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
