 | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
| | | | (...) BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA! To, to funny Bruce! Matt (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Given how recently you were in school and had English lessons, it's baffling(1) that you would get this wrong... it is "Too, too funny, Bruce!" unless you were giving someone directions and were using a "funny Bruce" as a landmark, that is. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts... —Matthew Gerber
| | | | | (...) Dagnabbit! You're right...I try to keep those two (to, too) straight by remembering that the primary usage of too is to mean "in addition, also", so it looked funny when I typed it "too, too funny" (also, also funny?), so I went and changed (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
