 | | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Not at all... it belongs in the category of logical fallacy. (...) My apologies for missing your point. I guess I'm just one of those people who, when hearing the hoofbeats, thinks horses, not zebras. (...) Sometimes it's enough to make one (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What Do You See Here?
|
|
(...) It has to be an upside down exclamation point as photographing angels is forbidden under the 'Dieties and Other Supernatural Beings Act of 1907'. :p -Dave (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) catagory of reasoning processes? It's not an antonym of reasoning? In the way I used it, it's NOT a verb facetiously inviting folks to reason out the meaning of a possibly glowing Snape head in the Harry Potter line, when there is no evidence (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Now that we have a range of pictures...some thoughts...
|
|
(...) Aw, gee Matt! I thought we had settled the question about begging the question.... (URL) C. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: What Do You See Here?
|
|
(...) It's an angel, of course! Maggie C. (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
