 | | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
|
(...) Yes (...) No... as in, no I did not say I wasn't self aware. At least not that I am aware of. Although I may have misquoted Shiri on what it was she actually said... (...) If you think you can, you would be best served in doing so when I am (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
|
(...) I wouldn't bet on him being rare, did you already forget Lindsay's finds of his namesakes all over the place? -Shiri (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
|
(...) I don't know... If Larry is proclaiming that he's not self-conscious (ie, self-aware) then by criteria already established here on LUGNET.OT, he can be slaughtered as a feed animal without generating any moral crises. So how does one cook a (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Episode II named
|
|
(...) Could be worse -- it could have been "Send in the Clones". (...) Doesn't everyone? (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Episode II named
|
|
(...) Why, you feel like attacking the SW movie? ;-) -Shiri (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
