Subject:
|
Re: SCAdians (was: some train thing)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 19:55:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2836 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes:
> > > never switch to all things Renaissance... you'll never catch me waving
> > > around one of those silly pokey swords, and wearing fruffly clothing.
> >
> > But in the Renaissance, armor and weapons got so much more elegant.
>
> I see people like that at all the time in the SCA; I think the preferred
> term is "fop" or "dandy." 8^)
Around here, we call them "swishy-poke". They call us a variety of more
stylish insults, but we heavy fighters are simple folk, with simple insults. ;)
> > On the other hand, were I an SCA type, I'd just as soon have the nice
> > ugly brigandine anyhow.
>
> I have several suits of chain, and SCA people ask if I fight in it. I
> say, why would I? It offers no impact protection, coupled with the added
> benefit of 60 extra pounds!
That's why I fight in a moving blanket (technical term: gambeson). It's a
little toasty, but I rarely get a significant bruise. Chain looks pretty,
but ain't exactly comfortable.
James
(for the curious, this is me on the right:
http://www.shades-of-night.com/random/00quadwar/iolarmalcolm1.jpg )
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: SCAdians (was: some train thing)
|
| (...) I see people like that at all the time in the SCA; I think the preferred term is "fop" or "dandy." 8^) (...) I have several suits of chain, and SCA people ask if I fight in it. I say, why would I? It offers no impact protection, coupled with (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
78 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
