|
|
 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) You really had to dredge that one up from the bowels. Can't we keep our language clean and toidee? In loo of that, I think the lot of you should just scat. wishing you warm seats at midnight, LFB (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Reuters report on Lego at New York Toy Fair
|
| Folks, This WWF discussion should not be in general. FUT to off.topic.debate or off.topic.fun, whatever suits your fancy. Thanks! Scott S. -- Want LEGO Elements at Great Prices? Visit The Sanburn Systems Company www.sanburnsystems.com Scott E. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
| (...) Well, as long as you were having fun. Point taken. ++Lar (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.
|
| Hey guys, I'm just posting about a meeting I didn't have with Lego Direct, but because I didn't sign a NDA, I wont go into details. What I can say however is: Something was said, Someone was there, Something happened (but I can't elaborate), and we (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LEGOs dirty trick: making money by not producing all masks as announced.
|
| (...) Yep, I would say so. I guess we should all be glad you did not specify boxers or jockey shorts! ;-) Maggie C. (24 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
