 | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —David Goeb
|
| | | (...) 10 REM Why GOTO is a bad idea 11 REM you find code like this... 30 FOR N = 1 TO 3 40 GOTO 100*N 50 NEXT N 55 END 60 REM Oh, so smart he cut himself 100 ? "One" 110 GOTO 50 200 ? "TWO" 210 GOTO 50 300 ? "Three" 310 GOTO 50 999 REM Best DaveG (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Yikes! That's not the JMP that's bad, it's the target calculation! That's what ON <expr> GOTO <label>, <label>, ... was created for! Steve (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough! —David Goeb
|
| | | | (...) [snip] (...) It's not what it was created for It's WHY it was created. Yes to make a bad practice part of the language, ROTFHMGUATI*. But more to the point adding ON to the debate is hardly going to advance GOTO's position as most hated (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
