 | | Re: Games, not Re: How does one become a "Guild of Bricksmiths(tm)" member?
|
|
(...) Yes, a number of times. Jury's still out on this one. I'll definitely play it again, but the scoring system tends to be completely incomprehensible to beginners, and what you need to emphasize seems to change dependant upon number of players (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A good use for Jar Jar figs.
|
|
(...) LOL! (...) Same here. We watched the movie in pshycology class, I got very close to PEWCing... Uch. (...) Um, well, I actually *didn't* see the ending... can you email me and tell me what happened? :-) -Shiri (26 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A good use for Jar Jar figs.
|
|
Just in case you still haven't figured this out. (...) That is Lord of the Flies. Big Difference. (...) Ha Ha. Lord of the Rings is so ingrained into pop-culture you don't even know it. It basicly invented the current day idea of wizards, dragons, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stephenson's Rocket
|
|
(...) but (...) OK. Knizia's games (the ones that I know at least) seem to have a fairly small ruleset by which the players manipulate stuff within a fixed space. These game/rule/logic systems have a veneer of theme pasted on. Often, even the best (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stephenson's Rocket
|
|
(...) Sounds good. Can you tell more about it? For example, I consider 1830 more "abstract" than eurorails. One of the reasons I like 1830 is the stock market manipulation. What do you mean by abstract.. For flat out beer and pretzels, it's tough to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
