 | | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | (...) "We" (who?) already are saying those things, statistically. We just shouldn't write them. What do you mean, "giving in?" This isn't even an issue of grammatical correctness--it's an issue of style. There is no rule in English that prohibits (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | (...) put"... (...) an (...) German has (...) and all (...) about "no (...) to (...) infinitive (...) before you know (...) started on (...) write them. (...) correctness--it's (...) and it's (...) that created (...) "split (...) have you (...) two (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | (...) LOL! :) Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator/CAD Operator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) "Aaaah! Suffice to say, 'tis the one word the Knights cannot stand to hear!" -LFB (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) You know, Wild Bill's statement gets a lot of press, and rightly so, given its idiocy. However, a considerable amount of time and effort has been spent in the field of Philosophy to resolve exactly this question, so we can't simply act as (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
