To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 3412
3411  |  3413
Subject: 
Re: Lego vs. Pokemon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 20:03:57 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.&nomorespam&net
Viewed: 
606 times
  
Eric Kingsley wrote:

> In lugnet.promo, Frank Filz writes:
> > Sproaticus wrote:
> > > 
> > > Kya Morden wrote:
> > > > I dunno, I put Pokemon in almost the same boat as Sanrio/Hello Kitty,
> > > > which is still around.
> > > > [...]  I think it'll be around with us for a long time,
> > > 
> > > Two words:  Beanie Babies.  *That* market dried up; Pokemon took its • place...
> > 
> > Three word? Pokemon Beanie Babies...
> 
> Nnnoooooooo...
> 
> I think we should all put our heads together and come up with the next fad that
> will take over when Pokemon is on the down turn.

Teenintendo Age Pokemario Beanie Pocket Rangers.  Then again, I'm not in marketing
either;-)

-John

> It would serve 2 purposes.
> 
> 1.  Finance our LEGO habits.
> 2.  Keep kids buying silly toys instead of LEGO leaving more for us.
> 
> Eric
> 
> The New England LEGO Users Group
> http://www.nelug.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego vs. Pokemon
 
(...) place... (...) Nnnoooooooo... I think we should all put our heads together and come up with the next fad that will take over when Pokemon is on the down turn. It would serve 2 purposes. 1. Finance our LEGO habits. 2. Keep kids buying silly (...) (27 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR