 | | Re: Current LEGO.COM survey —Scott Smallbeck
| | | | (...) Not this again. I got the same response in my last posting here: (URL) needs to be an on-topic.fun group! -- Scott Smallbeck scotts@contactics.com (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Current LEGO.COM survey —Matthew Miller
| | | | | (...) Hopefully, all of LUGnet is about fun in some way or another! I think "fun" lego posts are entirely appropriate in lugnet.general. "(set collection, educational usage, observations, original stories, games, holiday fun, rumors, musings, weird (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Current LEGO.COM survey —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) Definitely. Yup, this subject (the lego.com survey) is 100% on-topic to .general, falling into the "observations" and "etc." portions of "community- wide discussion of experiences and ideas (..., etc.)" and also under LEGO "business units" (if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
