 | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | (...) Online help is a rather unusual place for users to look in my experience, although I think we would both agree that it is the first (maybe second) place they should look. (...) Of course questions about it are relevant and fair. If I had (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Wow, I wasn't aware of any such message -- maybe Outlook Express gave it to you? Or did the server? --Todd (26 years ago, 22-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I only used OE for those 2 messages, never again. :) No, this was the error slrn was giving me a while back, the one that I was dealing with in a way that was breaking the thread list. Just got it again, as a matter of fact. Seems to be a (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | | Hi Finally I found where the folow up option is hiding..:-) Again a misunderstanding. I look for it from the view menu of the main Outlook window, but seen that it is located in the menu system of reply to window. Everything is OK now. Selçuk Mike (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | and yet ANOTHER builder ++Lar (26 years ago, 29-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe it's time for lugnet.off-topic.annoying ? :) (26 years ago, 29-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Richard Dee
|
| | | | | | (...) Or, lugnet.off-topic.forestry ???? (26 years ago, 30-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Jesse Long
|
| | | | | | Richard Dee wrote in message ... (...) Or lugnet.off-topic.com...eek-speak? Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in Deja News! (URL) (26 years ago, 30-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | Oh, I see. My Outlook Express version number is: 4.72.3110.1, the one which comes with Windows 98. Sorry about misunderstanding and easy flaming, but our point of views was somehow different, since I believe that I asked this question after enough (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | | (...) Are you saying that the Internet only has several years of history in Turkey? Because it's been around much longer here in the US -- I was a dial-up home user in 1991 and I believe it's been around since the 1970s. Sarah Heacock (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Hi Sarah, Yes I mean exactly that on. Turkey meet with internet in the second half of (actually nearly end of ) 1980's. since then it had been a pleasure for governmental/institutional workers and, especially, university students and academics. They (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | "Selçuk <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote: [a lot about the history of internet access in turkey] Really, you don't sound that far behind the situation here in the US. Maybe a year or so behind, but not dramatically so. (26 years ago, 23-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | another tree breaker ? ++Lar (26 years ago, 29-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: what is this folow up thingy? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Not exactly broken, per se, but netscape was reporting "done" after rendering the referenced append without showing the tree (which I was able to make substantially bigger by a few well chosen posts referencing certain nodes) and that (...) (26 years ago, 29-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
