 | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) John- Well, pretty good since it's only a first attempt. Clearly needs a little more pizazz, a little more show biz, maybe a little more Vegas? And you need to highlight the central figure a little more... -Ted (17 years ago, 18-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) Really, Ted? Well, how's this: (URL) (17 years ago, 18-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) I'd buy two of her if it would keep the company from going out of business. (URL) (17 years ago, 18-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) Give, give, give. That's about all you do, Bob. JOHN (17 years ago, 18-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) A babe improves anything by at least 50%. I think the font is way too timid though, and dangles too much. It's Vegas, my man, not Laughlin or State-Line. Again, however, I applaud the effort. -Keith (17 years ago, 18-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First logo attempt: KeithLUG
|
| (...) You are so correct. A family forum doesn't permit justice to this logo tack ("tack" being the operative word) This is a time when JLUG could have come in really handy... JOHN (17 years ago, 19-Oct-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
