 | | Finally, a Performance Artist I Can Admire!
|
| (URL) And the irony is that he is correct-- Duchamp probably would have approved. JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Finally, a Performance Artist I Can Admire!
|
| (...) Ironic, yes. But also a classic case of a missed opportunity for a great headline: Police to vandal: "Urinal lot of trouble." Dave! (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Finally, a Performance Artist I Can Admire!
|
| (...) hehe "Paris: Authorities didn't stand for pissed performance artist's work." I will keep an eye out for more leaked information. JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Finally, a Performance Artist I Can Admire!
|
| (...) Or "Iconoclast Defaces Porecelain God." Well, I guess that's not technically correct--maybe a urinal is a demigod? Dave! (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Finally, a Performance Artist I Can Admire!
|
| (...) Officials relieved damage wasn't bladder than it was. (...) Then a Demigoddess is this?: (URL) JOHN (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
