 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Okay Dave, I'm going to have to ask you to refrain from this kind of language. There is no acceptable situation to tell someone to go Jackstone themself. In fact, those could be regarded as fighting words, in which case someone may go Harry (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) If you're gonna swear, at least spell it right, you Megabloking Megablokholes. Hmm. "MegaBlokhole"... that really does sound evil. And I can't believe the audacity that some websites have. Swearing on a site intended for children. Sheesh: (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) No, that makes him the cowboy on the left. Giddyup Goldman rides again -- yeee-haaaaaaaa! -nk (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I see. So does that make Goldman a (URL) NWGWDAG>? JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) No joke on the Photoshop. The real Mark Sandlin is a 5'3" Korean woman - but all known photos of him have this giant leprauchan guy instead. -nk (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Seriously, can someone explain to me why pics of the GA's hair color always appear to have been altered in Photoshop? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) That and without a way to edit posts, typos can make it look like you swore. I found a few accidental typos while searching for swears the other day. Things like someone who misspelled "cut" by inserting an extra letter. Also you've got to (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) In practice I wouldn't have a problem with it, because I generally don't resort to profanity and wouldn't therefore have to worry about any word-substitution in my posts. But one dilemma is that it would imply that LUGNET as an entity is (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) The odd part, however, is that it makes it difficult to talk about various clone brands. For instance: "I MegaBloks hate stupid Megabloks" but the best part is, not just curse words are filtered out - certain other terms/words that offend yer (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) It's good to read you're OK with it. When I saw this the other day I thought "Hey! That's a very good idea!" An idea came to me this morning- how about a poll? It would a rating type with a list of clone brands in alphabetical order and (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
