| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Seriously, can someone explain to me why pics of the GA's hair color always appear to have been altered in Photoshop? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) That and without a way to edit posts, typos can make it look like you swore. I found a few accidental typos while searching for swears the other day. Things like someone who misspelled "cut" by inserting an extra letter. Also you've got to (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) In practice I wouldn't have a problem with it, because I generally don't resort to profanity and wouldn't therefore have to worry about any word-substitution in my posts. But one dilemma is that it would imply that LUGNET as an entity is (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) The odd part, however, is that it makes it difficult to talk about various clone brands. For instance: "I MegaBloks hate stupid Megabloks" but the best part is, not just curse words are filtered out - certain other terms/words that offend yer (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) It's good to read you're OK with it. When I saw this the other day I thought "Hey! That's a very good idea!" An idea came to me this morning- how about a poll? It would a rating type with a list of clone brands in alphabetical order and (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) As much as I don't care for the implied disparaging of my favorite brand, I have to admit that this is a pretty funny failsafe. Dave! (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, David Eaton wrote: (snipped Lester entirely, and most of what David said) (...) IIRC classic-castle.com has implemented just such a mechanism in their chat, everything profane that the filter substitutes for gets turned into (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Profanity again
|
|
(...) I always figured it'd be funny to replace people's swears automatically on the server. So if someone swore, their text would quickly get turned into something a bit tamer. Something like: s/freaking/buttermilk buscuit/gi s/bullpoop/muffin/gi (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Chicago LEGO Builders Meeting @ Woodridge Public Library
|
|
(...) Has anyone seen my thunder? I know I had it around here somewhere. Huh. :P Jason Spears | (URL) BrickCentral> | (URL) MichLUG> | (URL) CLB> (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.org.us.clb, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Just reach for Lugnet
|
|
(...) Shhhh, I'm sorting and booking hotel stays, I might mix up my accomodations. e (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Just reach for Lugnet
|
|
(...) Bed????? Hmmmmmm... Maybe that's why he moved on from stress balls to hotels. Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Just reach for Lugnet
|
|
(...) You need to regain your Lugnet, Eric, and go to bed. It's way past your bedtime. -Teddy (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) When the Supreme Intergalactic Ultimate LEGO Council of Bishops were deciding who to make the next Supreme Intergalactic UItimate LEGO Pope, the choice was obvious. There was only one person Supreme enough. There was only one person (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) Hey, who died and made you Pope? ++Lar (who has been known to hang with watery tarts, hoping for the best) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) nuqDaq yuch Dapol! -Jason (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | I need a big favor
|
|
I work with a guy whose last name is Hunter. For some reason he recently started a facetious campaign calling for his own demise. Specifically, he's been signing emails with a "Death to Hunter" byline, and he's encouraged us to do the same. We've (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | Nick Deluxe
|
|
So I was surfing around LUGNET and I found the Set Rank database. The lowest rated set is Nick Deluxe, but the first comment in the Notes section almost made me spit hot coffee out my nose. (URL) :D -Evil Wayne (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship)
|
|
(...) (URL) Scotty!> Dave! (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) Sorry, I didn't type "failed attempt" in as I meant to. The point is that I don't agree with your assessment that they were trying to be deeply philosophical, but rather not simply frivolous. (...) 1. "Public Knowledge": The only people who (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | Re: Monday Morning Diversion
|
|
(...) No, I regard it as a failed attempt at a deep philosophical message. (...) I think that in this case it has more to do with how long and clumsy the title is. I've only watched a couple eps myself (not having access to Comedy Central, or (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|