 | | Relatively cool site —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (URL) applet> takes a minute to load, but it's a cool-looking diversion. Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Relatively cool site —Steven D. Weiser
|
| | | | | (...) Very cool indeed!! I just returned from the trip. I need rest now. It was a very grueling drive. I hate rush hour traffic. Steven Weiser (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Relatively cool site —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I agree! See: (URL) this post> in .geek (At that time I asked if it ought to go into the geek front page. Guess I should have crossposted .fun too) (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Relatively cool site —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Whoa--that's every bit as cool as the link I posted! I'm sorry I missed it back then, but thanks for sharing it. Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Relatively cool site —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) So how cool IS it? Is it front page worthy on either or both webfrontpages? Tell us, Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Relatively cool site —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Well, it seems fine to me as a frontpage on at least one of them, but who am I to say? I mean, I know that my word is law in casual discourse, but this is ot.geek we're talking about here! Dave! (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
