Subject:
|
FWD: RASFWRJ: footnotes...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:08:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
245 times
|
| |
|
|
In , Tom York <T.J.York@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Boh. You need at least one self-referencial footnote in that...[1]
Nah. That's old. These days, you need *cyclical* footnotes. [0]
Jasper "What footnote?" Janssen
[0] Like this, sortof [1] [6]
[1] Well, that one isn't complete in itself of course. [2]
[2] The best thing about footnotes is long and convoluted [9]
sequences.[3]
[3] *very* convoluted [5]
[4] *very* out of order.
[5] If you don't think that's convoluted, try a sysadmins
footnoting[8]
[6] Real footnotes start at 0. All numbering systems start at 0 [21]
[7] Thread That Shall Not Be Named
[8] Or better yet, a graduate student. [0]
[9] And out of order. [4]
[10] Which i shall not name. [12]
[12] Duh.
[13... err, 12 b] now I need to fill the void to 21 at least[15]
[14] Never you mind Why I mention 666.[16]
[15] Did you notice 21 is not a prime number?[17]
[16] ObGeek: a 666 [19] MHz Pentium III is due out this year.
[17] As is 666.[14]
[18] For some obscure reason.[20]
[19] Though it's called 667 MHz.[18]
[20] I think I filled the gap.[22]
[21] Yes, that's close to a TTSNBN [10][7][13... err, 12 b.]
[22] Did someone mention a record number of footnotes?[24]
[23] As I recently read 100+ line post. [29]
[24] Which this won't be [23]
[25] Maybe this has gone on long enough. [27]
[26] The rest being fototnotes [25]
[27] Am I now a member of the footnote gang? [28]
[28] I'll keep it to less than 30 footnotes, I promise! [30]
[29] With only line above the sig.[26]
[30] Okay, one self-referential on for the road.[31]
[31] This is the last footnote.[32]
[32] Promise! Oh.. My mistake. I broke it before I even made it. [33]
[33] *This* is the last footnote.[31]
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: FWD: RASFWRJ: footnotes...
|
| STOP THE INSANITY!!! John "Susan Powder (1) (2)" Neal (1) a wacked-out weight loss chick on American "infomercials" who in a hoarse, screaming voice implores her faithful to stop the insanity and take control of their lives, presumably by eating (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: FWD: RASFWRJ: footnotes...
|
| On Tue, 2 Mar 1999 14:08:55 GMT, Jasper Janssen uttered the following profundities... (...) Armageddon! Perfect name for a PC, perhaps released in time for the y2k bug! Assuming it wouldn't be compliant.... (...) Oh.... ___...___ (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
