 | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) I just think it has great style -- way more style than most films. In a way the story is almost incidental to the main agenda of presenting a series of blacker than black comments and political criticisms about the modern world, and often (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) Eh? I am not sure what this means... (...) I don't know anything about Tolkien -- was he a university professor? In what way did he put Beowulf on the map? I am not sure that people have really ever forgotten their myths and folklore, although (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) I meant to ask you who and when is being rehashed. I was also going to bring up earlier that Tolkien is the guy who put Beowulf in the 20th-century curriculum. (...) Hmm... Liv Tyler (Arwen) is Elven. She is like her father Elrond, whom I hope (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship
|
| (...) I only saw a teeny piece of it, but it looked to have been better than that. Less cheese. I remember thinking that the lion looked fairly decent. -- Hop-Frog (25 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) No, I was entertained. The movie is good , just perhaps not great. But no, nothing about the movie made me stop and think about anything save its obvious visual beauty. Most of the stuff passing as a plot is little more than rehashed Norse (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
