Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:35:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1553 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> > >
> > > > In fact the odds are so _not_ with [life's formation] (about 1 in 10 with • 50,
> > > > give or take 10, zeros chance) that we could never have come into being
> > > > without some other force/being/etc behind it.
> > >
> > > Exactly! And evolution is that force!
> > >
> > > More precisely, where are you getting those figures? It differs markedly
> > > from the estimations for number of inhabitable planets in the galaxy, much
> > > less the universe.
> >
> >
> > (It's Friday, so I have time to do this :-))
> >
> > Evolution is not a force - it's:
> > a) a theory, involving
> > b) random chance
> >
> > Random chance cannot product life. the odds are just too far much.
>
> What scientific study are you quoting on those odds?
>
>
> > Indeed
> > today's leading edge evolution scientists have either a) ceased discussing • the
> > random chance and time tenants of evolution since they don't work out; or b)
> > claim that because they don't, we must have come from an alien race (another
> > intelligent life form)
> >
> > -Jon
>
> Not that I'm aware of. Sources?
I've started a new thread for this topic...
-Jon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
