 | | Uhh, back to tax again ;-) (Was Re: Is space property?) —Paul Baulch
| | | | Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) unfair, (...) You're right. I have made two mistakes in my argument: one was to invoke the ambiguous concept of "fairness", the other one was to rigidly stick to the dictionary definition of "stealing" (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Uhh, back to tax again ;-) (Was Re: Is space property?) —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) I agree that I am sort-of legally _not_ entitled to those portions of my personal property. There are some problems in the US with whether the income tax is actually legal, but I suppose that's an issue for an other time. My claims that (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Uhh, back to tax again ;-) (Was Re: Is space property?) —Paul Baulch
| | | | | Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) problem (...) I (...) The _concept_ of ownership is an ancient one, certainly, but as far as I know the laws of government are the only thing that _assign_ the right of ownership. (...) voluntarily (...) (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
