 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Larry, you really are a conceited. I'm happy for you to refer to me however you want - as I am pretty thick skinned. The positions I adopt are, often, more about educating myself than spamming this group with my philosophy on life, the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Can the two of you please take all of this offline to private email? --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Scott is free to email me whatever he likes, but I feel it is important that I and others continue to use .debate to discuss the larger topic of what makes a good .debate and a good .debater as and when appropriate. I think it's an important (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) What I meant was the personal jabs that keep going back and forth. --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Another day. Another contradictorily ironic post from Larry. Another conceitedly snide remark from Larry. What will tomorrow bring? Christmas!! (...) I really am trying: (URL) A (...) (24 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
