To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8045
8044  |  8046
Subject: 
Re: Polyamory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 18:41:26 GMT
Viewed: 
4415 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> 
> > I think that the reason we surround ourselves with social relationships of
> > various kinds is to satisfy needs.  (Needs in the soft sense, really more
> > appropriately called desires.)  I agree with Kevin that it is highly unlikely
> > that anyone ever finds one person who satisfies all those needs.  And it is
> > foolish to force yourself into this arbitrary moral framework that insists
> > that
> > monogamy is the only right way of doing it.  Why not open yourself up to
> > multiple lovers?
> 
> Not to put too fine a point on it, Chris, but given the above, isn't your
> accusing me of having an attitude, and asking who the hell I think I am to • make
> judgements, and calling my use of the term "copping out" a bad thing just a
> little, tiny, wee bit hypocritical?

Um...No.

I don't even see the link.  Are you reacting to the word foolish?  How would
you feel if I replaced the word foolish with 'probably a bad idea' or
'needless'?

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) Really? You don't see the link between asking what place of mine it is to judge another person's relationship choices, and then saying that seeking a monogamous relationship is "foolish" (or below, "needless", or "probably a bad" idea? (...) (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) Not to put too fine a point on it, Chris, but given the above, isn't your accusing me of having an attitude, and asking who the hell I think I am to make judgements, and calling my use of the term "copping out" a bad thing just a little, tiny, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR