Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 01:50:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1206 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
>
> You raise good points, Bill, but don't fall into the trap of trying to prove
> anything about Christ or God, at least to seasoned debaters such as Lar et al.
> They will eat you for lunch. But that's okay, because we don't need proof in
> order to have *faith* (the assurance of things unknown).
No trap, I was laying one, and it worked. I'm a big eater, he couldn't
handle my lunch. Besides, I was using a martial arts/fencing/military tactic
of realizing a perceived weakness, telegraphing it to lure the opponent and
then using it to my advantage.
I have my reasons for my style or apparent lack thereof. I get the responses
I want, for my own purposes.
>
> Of course, it cuts both ways. Neither can Lar provide any evidence to the
> contrary that God doesn't exist. But then he will blather on about the >burden of proof being incumbent upon us blah blah squirm blah.
You have to read my "mea culpa" message to understand what I was doing here:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=7607
"I'm NOT PLAYING, I'm CREATING!!"
Bill
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
231 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
