Subject:
|
Re: Arrggh!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 04:47:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@NOMORESPAMmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
131 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Lindsey <lindsey@nospam.mallorn.com> wrote:
> > Nah, MP3.com lost because *they* had copies to which they had no license.
> Not because they had copies (that's fair use under the Audio Home Recording
> Act of 1992, United States Code, Title 17, section 1008), but because they
> *distributed* copies for which they had no license (17 USC s. 1103).
Ok, but in either case, *they* had no license.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
