Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:21:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
970 times
|
| |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f405/2f4052fc7f9b83394eac8c4fa1668e81096153a3" alt="Post a public reply to this message" | |
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message
news:G3zEJ9.74n@lugnet.com...
> Oh, I thought you meant a way that was sure to avoid conception. The pill and
> other female-based chemical methods are pretty reliable. The condom is less
> so, but still pretty good. From there it's down hill. I'm not actually sure
> where anal sex fits in, but I bet it's near the top. OTOH, most women aren't
> willing to only have anal sex, so the point is moot.
Yep.
> > I do not advocate anal sex.
>
> Why not? It avoids pregnancy and abortion, right?
Personal and moral reasons.
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|